IELTS Band Score Chart 2026: How Raw Scores & Overall Bands Work

How the IELTS band score chart actually works: overall rounding rules, how Listening and Reading raw scores map to bands, Writing and Speaking criteria, and programme floors.

13 分で読める公開 2026年1月20日更新 2026年8月10日

How your overall IELTS band is calculated

Your overall band is the average of your Listening, Reading, Writing and Speaking bands, rounded to the nearest half band. Each individual skill is reported from 0 to 9 in 0.5 steps, so the overall figure depends entirely on how those four numbers average and round, not on any additional weighting between skills.

The general rounding pattern is straightforward once you see it laid out: an average ending near a quarter rounds up to the nearest half band, and an average ending near three-quarters rounds up to the next whole band. This is why two candidates with the same overall band can have quite different skill profiles underneath it.

Average of 4 skillsOverall band (typical rounding)
6.06.0
6.1256.0
6.256.5
6.56.5
6.757.0
7.257.5

How Listening and Reading raw-to-band tables actually work

Listening and Reading each have 40 items. Your raw score (the number correct out of 40) is converted into a band using an official conversion table, not a simple percentage. This matters because the mapping is not linear: a handful of extra correct answers near the middle of the range can shift your band more than the same handful would at the very top or bottom.

We deliberately do not publish a single fixed raw-to-band table here, because the exact conversion can shift slightly from test to test to keep difficulty fair across different exam versions - a table copied from one past paper will not always match another. DailyEnglishPro's Score Calculator embeds the current conversion logic so you get a reliable estimate after every practice set instead of relying on a static number that may already be out of date.

Score region (roughly)General patternWhat this means for practice
Top of the rangeVery few incorrect answers are tolerated for the highest bandsOne or two careless slips can visibly cost a band near the top
Middle of the rangeEach additional correct answer tends to matter more hereSmall accuracy gains from targeted drills often move the band fastest in this zone
Lower end of the rangeA wider spread of raw scores can map to the same lower bandFocus on question-type fundamentals before chasing small score increases

Why Academic and General Training Reading tables differ

Listening uses the same conversion approach for both Academic and General Training, since the audio content and question difficulty are shared. Reading is different: because General Training texts are generally shorter and more accessible in the early sections, its conversion table typically requires more correct answers to reach the same mid-range band compared with Academic Reading.

This is a common source of confusion when candidates compare raw scores with a friend sitting the other module. A General Training candidate scoring 32/40 and an Academic candidate scoring 30/40 are not automatically on the same band - always use the calculator's module-specific table rather than assuming the two modules behave identically.

  • Listening: one shared conversion approach for Academic and General Training.
  • Reading (Academic): its own conversion table, generally denser texts.
  • Reading (General Training): usually needs more correct answers for the same mid-range band.
  • Always select the correct module in the calculator before comparing raw scores with anyone else.

How Writing and Speaking bands are set

Writing and Speaking have no raw score at all. Instead, an examiner (or in some Speaking formats, a recorded assessment process) rates four separate criteria from 0 to 9, and the average of those four criteria becomes the skill band, following the same half-band rounding logic used for the overall score.

Because the band is an average of four criteria, improving only one - say, vocabulary - while the other three stay flat often fails to move the overall Writing or Speaking band at all. Balanced improvement across all four criteria is usually what unlocks the next half band, not deep mastery of a single one.

Writing criteria

Four criteria averaged, no raw score.

  • Task Response / Task Achievement
  • Coherence and Cohesion
  • Lexical Resource
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy

Speaking criteria

Four criteria averaged, no raw score.

  • Fluency and Coherence
  • Lexical Resource
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy
  • Pronunciation

Programme and visa band floors

Many universities, professional bodies and visa pathways set a minimum for each individual skill, in addition to a minimum overall band. Hitting an overall 6.5 with a Writing band of 5.5 can still fall short of a programme that separately requires Writing 6.0, even though the overall figure looks sufficient at first glance.

Requirements vary widely by institution and by visa stream, and they change over time, so treat any number here as a planning pattern rather than an exact figure - always confirm the current requirement on the official offer letter, regulator page, or visa checklist before you book a test date.

GoalTypical patternWhy floors matter
Undergraduate studyOverall in the 6.0-6.5 range is commonSkill floors (often around 5.5-6.0) can still apply per section
Competitive postgraduate studyOverall 7.0 or higher is commonHigher floors are frequent for Writing given academic report demands
Migration pathwaysRequirements map to each country's own frameworkGeneral Training floors are usually checked skill by skill, not just overall

Turning raw scores into a plan

The three tools referenced throughout this guide work best used together, in sequence, after every practice session rather than only before booking the real exam.

  1. 1After Listening or Reading practiceRun the raw score through the Score Calculator to get a current band estimate for that module.
  2. 2When feedback names a Writing or Speaking criterionOpen Band Descriptors to see exactly what that criterion rewards at your target band and the one above it.
  3. 3When comparing across skills or examsUse the Score Converter to see your estimated overall band and, if relevant, approximate ranges for other English tests.

Frequently asked questions

Can one weak skill pull the overall band down?+

Yes. A 5.5 in Writing alongside three 7.0s can still leave you short of a 6.5 overall after averaging and rounding. Treat the lowest skill as the priority, since it usually has the most room to raise the overall figure.

Are Academic and General Training Reading conversion tables the same?+

No. General Training Reading usually needs more correct answers to reach the same mid-range bands as Academic Reading. Always use the calculator's module-specific table when practising General Training.

Why don't you publish an exact raw-to-band table?+

The exact conversion can shift slightly between test versions to keep difficulty fair. A fixed table copied from one past paper will not reliably match another, so the Score Calculator uses current conversion logic instead of a single static chart.

Is CEFR the same scale as an IELTS band?+

No. CEFR is a separate framework. Approximate maps between the two exist for general guidance only - always trust the specific IELTS number printed on your offer letter or visa checklist over an informal CEFR comparison.