IELTS Band Score Chart Explained (2026)
IELTS band score chart for 2026: overall rounding, Listening and Reading raw-to-band mapping, Writing and Speaking criteria, plus plain-language profiles for what bands 5.0 to 8.0+ mean.
How your overall IELTS band is calculated
Your overall band is the average of your Listening, Reading, Writing and Speaking bands, rounded to the nearest half band. Each individual skill is reported from 0 to 9 in 0.5 steps, so the overall figure depends entirely on how those four numbers average and round, not on any additional weighting between skills.
The general rounding pattern is straightforward once you see it laid out: an average ending near a quarter rounds up to the nearest half band, and an average ending near three-quarters rounds up to the next whole band. This is why two candidates with the same overall band can have quite different skill profiles underneath it.
| Average of 4 skills | Overall band (typical rounding) |
|---|---|
| 6.0 | 6.0 |
| 6.125 | 6.0 |
| 6.25 | 6.5 |
| 6.5 | 6.5 |
| 6.75 | 7.0 |
| 7.25 | 7.5 |
What band scores mean: 5.0 to 8.0+
An IELTS band describes how independently and accurately you can use English across the four skills. It is not a percentage exam score, and it is not comparable to a school grade. Use the table below as a rough map of what each band tends to feel like day to day; open Band Descriptors when you need the exact examiner language for a specific criterion.
| Band | Plain-language profile | Common targets |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | Partial user; understands general meaning but struggles noticeably with complex or unfamiliar language | Some foundation or pathway programmes |
| 5.5 | Partial user with more consistency; frequent strain on longer or more abstract tasks | Foundation programmes; conditional pathway offers |
| 6.0 | Competent user; handles familiar, everyday and some academic tasks with occasional inaccuracy | Many undergraduate offers |
| 6.5 | Competent user with more control; fewer errors that block meaning, clearer organisation | Common undergraduate and some postgraduate offers |
| 7.0 | Good user; generally effective command with occasional inaccuracies in unfamiliar situations | Competitive postgraduate courses; many professional bodies |
| 7.5 | Good user with strong flexibility; handles complex language with only occasional lapses | Higher professional and academic bars |
| 8.0+ | Very good to expert user; fully operational command, precise and flexible even in unfamiliar contexts | Highly competitive professional and academic requirements |
How Listening and Reading raw-to-band tables actually work
Listening and Reading each have 40 items. Your raw score (the number correct out of 40) is converted into a band using an official conversion table, not a simple percentage. This matters because the mapping is not linear: a handful of extra correct answers near the middle of the range can shift your band more than the same handful would at the very top or bottom.
We deliberately do not publish a single fixed raw-to-band table here, because the exact conversion can shift slightly from test to test to keep difficulty fair across different exam versions - a table copied from one past paper will not always match another. DailyEnglishPro's Score Calculator embeds the current conversion logic so you get a reliable estimate after every practice set instead of relying on a static number that may already be out of date.
| Score region (roughly) | General pattern | What this means for practice |
|---|---|---|
| Top of the range | Very few incorrect answers are tolerated for the highest bands | One or two careless slips can visibly cost a band near the top |
| Middle of the range | Each additional correct answer tends to matter more here | Small accuracy gains from targeted drills often move the band fastest in this zone |
| Lower end of the range | A wider spread of raw scores can map to the same lower band | Focus on question-type fundamentals before chasing small score increases |
Why Academic and General Training Reading tables differ
Listening uses the same conversion approach for both Academic and General Training, since the audio content and question difficulty are shared. Reading is different: because General Training texts are generally shorter and more accessible in the early sections, its conversion table typically requires more correct answers to reach the same mid-range band compared with Academic Reading.
This is a common source of confusion when candidates compare raw scores with a friend sitting the other module. A General Training candidate scoring 32/40 and an Academic candidate scoring 30/40 are not automatically on the same band - always use the calculator's module-specific table rather than assuming the two modules behave identically.
- Listening: one shared conversion approach for Academic and General Training.
- Reading (Academic): its own conversion table, generally denser texts.
- Reading (General Training): usually needs more correct answers for the same mid-range band.
- Always select the correct module in the calculator before comparing raw scores with anyone else.
How Writing and Speaking bands are set
Writing and Speaking have no raw score at all. Instead, an examiner (or in some Speaking formats, a recorded assessment process) rates four separate criteria from 0 to 9, and the average of those four criteria becomes the skill band, following the same half-band rounding logic used for the overall score.
Because the band is an average of four criteria, improving only one - say, vocabulary - while the other three stay flat often fails to move the overall Writing or Speaking band at all. Balanced improvement across all four criteria is usually what unlocks the next half band, not deep mastery of a single one.
Writing criteria
Four criteria averaged, no raw score.
- •Task Response / Task Achievement
- •Coherence and Cohesion
- •Lexical Resource
- •Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Speaking criteria
Four criteria averaged, no raw score.
- •Fluency and Coherence
- •Lexical Resource
- •Grammatical Range and Accuracy
- •Pronunciation
Programme and visa band floors
Many universities, professional bodies and visa pathways set a minimum for each individual skill, in addition to a minimum overall band. Hitting an overall 6.5 with a Writing band of 5.5 can still fall short of a programme that separately requires Writing 6.0, even though the overall figure looks sufficient at first glance.
Requirements vary widely by institution and by visa stream, and they change over time, so treat any number here as a planning pattern rather than an exact figure - always confirm the current requirement on the official offer letter, regulator page, or visa checklist before you book a test date.
| Goal | Typical pattern | Why floors matter |
|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate study | Overall in the 6.0-6.5 range is common | Skill floors (often around 5.5-6.0) can still apply per section |
| Competitive postgraduate study | Overall 7.0 or higher is common | Higher floors are frequent for Writing given academic report demands |
| Migration pathways | Requirements map to each country's own framework | General Training floors are usually checked skill by skill, not just overall |
Turning raw scores into a plan
The three tools referenced throughout this guide work best used together, in sequence, after every practice session rather than only before booking the real exam.
- 1After Listening or Reading practiceRun the raw score through the Score Calculator to get a current band estimate for that module.
- 2When feedback names a Writing or Speaking criterionOpen Band Descriptors to see exactly what that criterion rewards at your target band and the one above it.
- 3When comparing across skills or examsUse the Score Converter to see your estimated overall band and, if relevant, approximate ranges for other English tests.
次の練習
Frequently asked questions
Can one weak skill pull the overall band down?+
Yes. A 5.5 in Writing alongside three 7.0s can still leave you short of a 6.5 overall after averaging and rounding. Treat the lowest skill as the priority, since it usually has the most room to raise the overall figure.
Are Academic and General Training Reading conversion tables the same?+
No. General Training Reading usually needs more correct answers to reach the same mid-range bands as Academic Reading. Always use the calculator's module-specific table when practising General Training.
Why don't you publish an exact raw-to-band table?+
The exact conversion can shift slightly between test versions to keep difficulty fair. A fixed table copied from one past paper will not reliably match another, so the Score Calculator uses current conversion logic instead of a single static chart.
Is CEFR the same scale as an IELTS band?+
No. CEFR is a separate framework. Approximate maps between the two exist for general guidance only - always trust the specific IELTS number printed on your offer letter or visa checklist over an informal CEFR comparison.